2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-005-3867-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of grain size determination by light microscopy and EBSD analysis

Abstract: The characterization and measurement of grain structures is of great importance to materials scientists because not only does grain size strongly affect the mechanical properties, but it also has an influence on physical properties, surface properties and [3,4,5,6,7]. In most cases, it is assumed that the microstructure features, especially the grain size obtained from light microscopy and EBSD are the same. However, there is very little information available in literature related to the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be pointed out that the grain sizes of T92 and Eurofer 97 steels are evaluated by optical microscopy; and the grain sizes of Eurofer ODS steels are measured by EBSD technique because their grains are too small to be distinguished in an optical microscope. It is known that the grain size obtained from EBSD is more precise than that from optical microscopy [6]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It should be pointed out that the grain sizes of T92 and Eurofer 97 steels are evaluated by optical microscopy; and the grain sizes of Eurofer ODS steels are measured by EBSD technique because their grains are too small to be distinguished in an optical microscope. It is known that the grain size obtained from EBSD is more precise than that from optical microscopy [6]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A discrepancy of the same magnitude has been documented in a careful analysis of grain sizes determined by OIM and optical microscopy methods applied to a low-carbon steel and also to an Al-Cu-Mg alloy. [48] In samples of these materials, microhardness indentations were employed to identify regions that were then examined by both OIM and optical microscopy. It was shown that numerous boundaries that had been identified by orientation differences in OIM were not revealed by conventional polishing and etching.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar discrepancies between OIM and optical microscopy have been attributed to the different mechanisms for identifying grains in these techniques. [48] In these AA5083 materials, the processing has resulted in fine, equiaxed, and stable grains and predominantly high-angle boundaries. Thus, upon heating prior to QPF, the microstructure meets the prerequisites for superplasticity.…”
Section: A Recrystallization Of the As-received Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffraction-based techniques for localized crystal orientation measurements, such as EBSD, are of central importance today for a characterization of these fine-scale microstructural features [22][23][24]. In addition to the grain size determination, there are a number of important microstructural parameters evaluated from EBSD but not available from conventional methods of grain characterization, in particular parameters relating to the grain orientations and boundary characters [25].…”
Section: Experimental Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%