2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00484-019-01839-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of ground-based methods for obtaining large-scale, high-resolution data on the spring leaf phenology of temperate tree species

Abstract: A comparison of ground-based methods for obtaining large-scale, high-resolution data on the spring leaf phenology of temperate tree species Smith, AM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(94 reference statements)
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unsurprisingly, the CC and the interpolated DWD phenology of F. sylvatica largely match. Corresponding to literature findings (Ahrends et al., 2009; Smith & Ramsay, 2020) F. excelsior leaves out later than F. sylvatica .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unsurprisingly, the CC and the interpolated DWD phenology of F. sylvatica largely match. Corresponding to literature findings (Ahrends et al., 2009; Smith & Ramsay, 2020) F. excelsior leaves out later than F. sylvatica .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The observation that indirect derivation methods are the first to indicate the start of spring phenology, compared to direct methods observing the trees themselves can therefore be primarily explained by the recording of the understory, which shows a clear drawback of the recording method. Unsurprisingly, the CC and the interpolated DWD phenology of F. sylvatica largely match.Corresponding to literature findings(Ahrends et al, 2009;Smith & Ramsay, 2020) F. excelsior leaves out later than F. sylvatica.Advancing trends of SOS in the Hainich National Park from 2000 to 2020 are predominantly in line with the current literature(Caparros-Santiago et al, 2021;Menzel et al, 2020;…”
supporting
confidence: 82%