2011
DOI: 10.1080/19424280.2011.575388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of ground reaction force patterns of conventional running shoes and minimalistic footwear in habitually shod runners

Abstract: Considering the pressure distribution over the foot dorsum for all conditions, Area 4 is the one with higher level of pressures, followed by Area 1. Area 2 is placed in an intermediate level, while Area 3 and Area 5 are the ones with lower pressures.Maximal peaks of the average pressure curves of Area 4 are 137 kPa for first condition, 251 kPa for second condition, and 344 kPa for third condition. Discussion and conclusionAverage pressure patterns over the foot have been obtained when kicking a soccer ball und… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, changes have been applied to shoe materials to alter the ground reaction force patterns in human locomotion (Reenalda, Freriks, & Buurke, 2011). Several studies have also asserted that by using a certain material in shoe soles that provides the forefoot with greater bending elasticity, the dissipation of applied forces is diminished (Lin et al, 2013;Stefanyshyn & Nigg, 1998) without changing the joint angle of the lower extremity (Stefanyshyn & Nigg, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In previous studies, changes have been applied to shoe materials to alter the ground reaction force patterns in human locomotion (Reenalda, Freriks, & Buurke, 2011). Several studies have also asserted that by using a certain material in shoe soles that provides the forefoot with greater bending elasticity, the dissipation of applied forces is diminished (Lin et al, 2013;Stefanyshyn & Nigg, 1998) without changing the joint angle of the lower extremity (Stefanyshyn & Nigg, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%