2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03904.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, and human T‐lymphotropic virus marker rates for directed versus volunteer blood donations to the American Red Cross during 2005 to 2010

Abstract: Directed donations have declined by 92% at the ARC since 1995, but have higher viral marker rates than volunteer donations. The difference can be explained in part by the effects of first-time or repeat status of the donors. Patients considering directed donation should be appropriately counseled about the potential risks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, directed blood donors have higher viral marker rates than volunteer donors. 22 Furthermore, as intestinal microbiota have recently been theorized to potentially be involved in the pathogenesis of a number of systemic diseases, rigorously screened, healthy volunteer donors may have advantages, especially for young patients, who may acquire additional risk factors for disease over their lifetime.…”
Section: Current Treatment Guidelines and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, directed blood donors have higher viral marker rates than volunteer donors. 22 Furthermore, as intestinal microbiota have recently been theorized to potentially be involved in the pathogenesis of a number of systemic diseases, rigorously screened, healthy volunteer donors may have advantages, especially for young patients, who may acquire additional risk factors for disease over their lifetime.…”
Section: Current Treatment Guidelines and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results indicate that "cheaper" qualitative ID-NAT may provide an alternative cost-effective community-based screening technology for AHI in similar populations of MSM with an HIV prevalence >0.4%. The potential detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in persons at risk for HIV represents an additional benefit of the EarlyTest algorithm, as the Procleix Ultrio assay, which is used for HIV NAT screening, may also detect proportions of HBV and HCV infections [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of p24 Ag by the ARCHITECT Ag/Ab Combo assay is currently the most widely used approach for detecting AHI [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Alternative approaches for detecting and differentiating p24 Ag and HIV Ab include the rapid Alere Determine HIV-1/2 Combo assay and more sensitive HIV-1 nucleic acid amplification tests (NATs) [14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent estimate for the Southeastern and Northeastern regions of Brazil in 2007-2008 was 92.2 per 100.000 the first time blood donors (Sabino et al 2012). These figures are considerably higher than the USA HIV prevalence per 100.000 blood donors of 2.9 in 2010 (Dorsey et al, 2013) and 4.0 in 2008 (Zou et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%