Thermosense XXV 2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.485869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of image processing algorithms for thermal nondestructive evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of these methods has advantages for specific tasks. Several methods address the challenge of getting a higher image quality; therefore image processing/analysis have become a central issue within almost all thermal non-destructive testing (TNDT) problems [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these methods has advantages for specific tasks. Several methods address the challenge of getting a higher image quality; therefore image processing/analysis have become a central issue within almost all thermal non-destructive testing (TNDT) problems [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where σ is the standard deviation of the noise and Sarea mean and Narea mean are the average values of each area, respectively [13]. The automatic quantification method, which is based on signal to noise ratio analysis applied to the processing techniques of the images mentioned of the previous sections, is independent of how the defect appears in the material.…”
Section: Signal To Noise Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, adapting and modifying the algorithms, they can be applied to the other existing techniques. These techniques can be mainly classified in three groups: techniques using thermal contrast [6], techniques based on transforms [3] and techniques using statistical methods [7,8]. Some of the main techniques of these groups will be explained below.…”
Section: Processing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, some of these routines as thermal signal reconstruction (TSR) [6] requires a priori knowledge of the defectives depth and their lateral dimensions, in other words their aspect ratio (depth/lateral dimension), to provide accurate depth predictions. Additionally, other routines such as pulse phase thermography PPT [7] provide inconsistent predictions when varying the sampling rate and/or the experiment duration [8,9]. So, in this application we utilize a novel processing routine named "self-referencing" presented in [10], due to its insensitivity to implants aspect ratio and experiment variations.…”
Section: Data Processing and Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%