2002
DOI: 10.1177/019394502762477004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Imputation Techniques for Handling Missing Data

Abstract: Researchers are commonly faced with the problem of missing data. This article presents theoretical and empirical information for the selection and application of approaches for handling missing data on a single variable. An actual data set of 492 cases with no missing values was used to create a simulated yet realistic data set with missing at random (MAR) data. The authors compare and contrast five approaches (listwise deletion, mean substitution, simple regression, regression with an error term, and the expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
147
1
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
147
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the EM (Expectation Maximisation) procedure for imputation (Musil, Warner, Yobas, & Jones, 2002). Subsequently, we checked whether this imputation influenced the outcomes of all planned analyses.…”
Section: Data Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the EM (Expectation Maximisation) procedure for imputation (Musil, Warner, Yobas, & Jones, 2002). Subsequently, we checked whether this imputation influenced the outcomes of all planned analyses.…”
Section: Data Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all areas of quantitative and qualitative research there is the likelihood of missing values in data collection (Acock, 2005;De Leeuw, 2001;Dodeen, 2003;Molenberghs, 2007;Musil, Warner, Yobas, & Jones, 2002;Raaijmakers, 1999;Wainer, Bradlow, & Wang, 2007). There are various reasons why data are missing.…”
Section: Data Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major ways of data collection include "the self-administered questionnaire, the face-to-face interview, and the telephone interview" (De Leeuw, 2001, p. 152 (Acock, 2005;Huisman, 2000;Musil, et al, 2002).…”
Section: Data Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Musil et al [10] provided empirical comparative analysis on list wise deletion, mean substitution, simple regression, regression with an error term and the EM algorithm. Junninen et al [11] experimented on univariate linear, spline and nearest-neighbor interpolation algorithm, multivariate regularized expectation-maximization algorithm, nearest-neighbor, self-organizing map, multilayer perceptron (MLP) as well as hybrid methods where combining the best features of univariate and multivariate methods are combined in air quality datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%