2015 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium 2015
DOI: 10.1109/mwsym.2015.7166826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of indirect learning and closed loop estimators used in digital predistortion of power amplifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After learning the postinverter, the coefficients are copied to the predistorter. Although this simplifies the learning of DPD coefficients, it has been shown to converge to a biased solution due to noise in the PA output [8,9]. Moreover, the LS problem is often poorly conditioned [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After learning the postinverter, the coefficients are copied to the predistorter. Although this simplifies the learning of DPD coefficients, it has been shown to converge to a biased solution due to noise in the PA output [8,9]. Moreover, the LS problem is often poorly conditioned [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two architectures are generally employed for model extraction: direct learning architecture (DLA) and indirect learning architecture (IDLA) [15], [16]. The DLA is usually used in closed-loop systems and compares the PA output with the original input directly.…”
Section: A Complexity Of Model Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iterative rotation can be described as (15) where I i and represents the real and imaginary part of the complex number, respectively, and i designates the i th rotation.…”
Section: A Magnitude |̃| Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations