A comparison of injuries sustained from recreational compared to organized motorized vehicle use in children

Mahida, Justin B.; Asti, Lindsey; Patel, Kishan; Deans, Katherine J.; Minneci, Peter C.; Groner, Jonathan I.; Raval, Mehul V.

doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.10.047

Cited by 7 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…4 A similar analysis of emergency department attendances at a single centre in the United States found that 9.5% (n ¼ 56) of all treated injuries were concussion in motocross and all-terrain vehicle riders. 5 In a separate study, when surveying an entire motocross racing season, it was found that 48% (n ¼ 67) of riders experienced at least one self-reported symptom of concussion. 12 These results were translated to Emergency Department attendances in a separate study at the same institution, where it was found that between 2000 and 2007, 19% (n ¼ 57) of all attendances were attributed to concussion.…”

Section: The Problem Of Concussion In Motor Sportmentioning

confidence: 99%

Concussion in motor sport: A medical literature review and engineering perspective

Deakin

Cronin

Trafford

et al. 2017

Journal of Concussion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

WARNING: motor sport can be dangerous'. The spectrum of head injuries in motor sport has shifted dramatically in recent decades, fuelled by advances in medicine and engineering. Despite these successes, there are growing public and professional concerns regarding concussion in motor sport. This review appraises the published literature concerning concussion in motor sport, with particular focus on the current medical and technical challenges in the field. The incidence and assessment of concussion in motor sport is discussed, in addition to modifiable risk factors within and outside the automobile environment. Lastly, areas for further research and development are outlined.

show abstract

Section: The Problem Of Concussion In Motor Sportmentioning

confidence: 99%

Concussion in motor sport: A medical literature review and engineering perspective

Deakin

Cronin

Trafford

et al. 2017

Journal of Concussion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The majority of injuries sustained by motocross participants include minor contusions and lacerations, however, more serious injuries such as extremity fractures and head injuries are also common. 1 – 12 In the U.S., motocross has the fourth highest incidence of head and neck injuries suffered by athletes who participate in extreme sports. 17 Recreational off-road motorbike riders experience similar injuries as riders in regulated events, yet these riders are also less likely to wear protective equipment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… 17 Recreational off-road motorbike riders experience similar injuries as riders in regulated events, yet these riders are also less likely to wear protective equipment. 12 – 16 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Protective Equipment Used Among Motorbike Riders

Stiles

Benge

Stiles

et al. 2019

kjm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThis study compared outcomes between patients injured at a motorbike track, which requires riders to follow safety equipment guidelines, and those involved in recreational riding where safety equipment usage is voluntary.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of all patients presenting with motorbike-related injuries at an American College of Surgeons verified level-I trauma center between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013. Data collected included demographics, injury details, safety equipment use, hospitalization details, and discharge disposition. Comparisons were made regarding protective equipment usage.ResultsAmong the 115 patients admitted, more than half (54.8%, n = 63) were injured on a motorbike track, and 45.2% (n = 52) were injured in a recreational setting. The majority of patients were male (93.9%), Caucasian (97.4%), and between the ages of 18 to 54 (64.4%). Helmet usage was higher among track riders (95.2%, n = 60) than recreational riders (46.2%, n = 24, p < 0.0001). Comparisons of injury severity and outcomes between those who wore protective equipment and those who did not were not significant.ConclusionEven though track riders wore protective equipment more than recreational riders, there was no difference between the groups regarding injury severity or hospital outcomes. These results suggested that motocross riders should not rely on protective equipment as the only measure of injury prevention.

show abstract

“…Additionally, many companies advertise these motorized recreational vehicles as toys, causing consumer misconception regarding the dangers involved with their operation. The operation of ATVs is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, particularly with users under the age of 15 years old …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The operation of ATVs is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, particularly with users under the age of 15 years old. 3 Although many studies have described the consequences of ATV-related injuries, there have been few that have investigated facial trauma related to off-road vehicles. Some studies have investigated the use of helmets with off-road vehicles, particularly with traumatic brain injuries, ocular injuries, and craniofacial fractures, 2,4,5 but few have utilized nationally representative data with regard to head and neck trauma.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%