1988
DOI: 10.1016/0042-207x(88)90492-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of ion and fast atom beam reduction in TiO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
36
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The binding energies determined for these levels were very close to those reported in literature for titanium dioxide [19,20]. A different picture is shown by both Ta-16 and Ta-4-16, and Ta-MCM catalysts, in which the higher values may account for a better incorporation of titanium in the solid network [21].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The binding energies determined for these levels were very close to those reported in literature for titanium dioxide [19,20]. A different picture is shown by both Ta-16 and Ta-4-16, and Ta-MCM catalysts, in which the higher values may account for a better incorporation of titanium in the solid network [21].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The oxidized surface layer is confirmed to be TiO 2 with the expected peaks for Ti 4+ (Ti2p 1/2 at 458.5 eV and Ti2p 3/2 at 464.2 eV) and O 2-(529.7 eV -The peak at 531.3 eV is due to surface hydroxyl groups) exhibited in the spectra [12][13][14][15]. Similar peaks were observed for all oxidized titanium surfaces.…”
Section: 1supporting
confidence: 61%
“…All the photoanode films show two binding energy peaks at 458.770.1 and 464.570.05 eV, corresponding to the Ti 2p 3/2 and Ti 2p 1/2 transitions, respectively. The intensity of peaks increase gradually with passing of treating time, revealing that the amount of deposited TiO 2 also increase accordingly [25]. Figure. 2b shows the O 1s spectra of samples, while the insets show spectrums of the reference (the blank sample) and ZnO film with 20 min surface modification.…”
Section: Surface Modification and Interface Properties Variationmentioning
confidence: 87%