A comparison of Korean and US continuous improvement projects

Abstract

Purpose – Quality Circles and Kaizen Events have resulted in productivity and quality improvements for organizations. There is limited empirical research comparing these two approaches. This research study was designed to understand the similarities and differences in the structure and outcomes of these two popular continuous improvement approaches in Korea and the USA. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – A logic model was used to structure a comparative analysis of Quality Circles and Kaizen Events undertaken in six different organizations in Korea and the USA. A logic model framework consisting of four areas (resources, activities, outputs and outcomes) was used to assess the key components of these six improvement projects. Data for three different comparative case study project pairs were collected. Projects were matched on both manufacturer-level and project-level characteristics. Matched projects were similar in size and type of product produced. Findings – Similarities between Quality Circles and Kaizen Events were identified in every component of the logic model. Both mechanisms were effective in driving improvements in performance and in motivating employees, even though significant differences in the project size, type, and industrial sector existed across the six different projects. Originality/value – There was no evidence to support the conclusion that one continuous improvement approach is more or less effective than the other. Both approaches produced improvements in both technical and social system outcomes. Overall, it appears based on this study, that both Quality Circles and Kaizen Events can be successfully deployed in an organization's continuous improvement journey.

The impact of applying the target cost and continuous improvement (Kaizen) on achieving the sustainable competitive advantage of Palestinian industrial companies

“…Kaizen events represent swift and radical implementations of Kaizen at the team level (Van Dun and Wilderom, 2016;Hirzel et al, 2017). Kaizen offers several benefits, including improved productivity, waste reduction, increased profit, client satisfaction, quality enhancement and competitive advantage (Jin and Doolen, 2014).…”

“…Kaizen offers several benefits, including improved productivity, waste reduction, increased profit, client satisfaction, quality enhancement and competitive advantage (Jin and Doolen, 2014).…”

Participative Management for Team Effectiveness and Innovation

“…Quality Improved quality a) [18] b) [19] c) [20] d) [19] QCs improved quality. QCs improved quality.…”

A New Model of Continuous Improvement in Total Quality Management from an Islamic Perspective

“…Besides the above approaches of CI, other approaches are practised in organisations to improve quality. Some studies showed that different approaches to CI are equally effective in driving improvements in both technical and social systems, even though there are significant differences in the project size, type, location, and industrial sector (Jin & Doolen, 2014). Another study found out that the success of the use of CI approaches depends on the culture of the organisation and the capability of the managers and leaders to implement those approaches effectively (Robinson & Phuong, 2015).…”