2007
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000257925.36641.9e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Laser-Assisted Drug Delivery at Two Output Energies for Enhancing the Delivery of Topically Applied LMX-4® Cream Prior to Venipuncture

Abstract: LAD at an energy of 2.0 J/cm2 (570 mJ) is as effective, with similar adverse events, as an energy of 3.5 J/cm2 (1000 mJ) in facilitating topical anesthesia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…86 Another randomized, double-blind, crossover study of adults compared the efficacy and adverse-event profile for laser-assisted delivery of topical anesthetic before venipuncture using 2 output energies (2.0 and 3.5 J/cm 2 ). 89 Mean VAS pain scores were not statistically different (P ϭ .57) between the low-energy (mean ϭ 6.7) and high-energy (mean ϭ 8.1) lasers.…”
Section: Laser-assisted Local Anesthetic Deliverymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…86 Another randomized, double-blind, crossover study of adults compared the efficacy and adverse-event profile for laser-assisted delivery of topical anesthetic before venipuncture using 2 output energies (2.0 and 3.5 J/cm 2 ). 89 Mean VAS pain scores were not statistically different (P ϭ .57) between the low-energy (mean ϭ 6.7) and high-energy (mean ϭ 8.1) lasers.…”
Section: Laser-assisted Local Anesthetic Deliverymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…There appears to be no diminution in the degree of analgesia at lower energy laser settings (2.0 J/cm 2 ), compared to the high energy (3.5 J/cm 2 ) settings used in the aforementioned studies, as inferred from an intra-individual study of 30 patients comparing both settings, with one used on each antecubital fossa [35].…”
Section: Local Anaestheticsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For the second pass, the average pain score at the beginning was 3.4 (range, [3][4]; it rose to 3.6 during treatment (range, 2-6) and, by the end of the treatment, reached a peak of 4.0 (range, 2-6). All patients stated that they would undergo repeat treatments with this method of analgesia again.…”
Section: Group Bmentioning
confidence: 95%