2013
DOI: 10.1080/10963758.2013.826940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Learning Outcomes in Culinary Education: Recorded Video vs. Live Demonstration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research reports indicate that students exposed to face-to-face instruction and video-recorded teaching attained similar levels of culinary skills and knowledge. Importantly, however, students receiving face-to-face instruction performed significantly better on group assessments than on individual assessments, whereas students receiving video-assisted instructions did well on both group and individual pieces of assessment (Brown, Mao & Chesser, 2013). According to Oh and Park (2009) blended learning is a new delivery mode that combines face-to-face teaching using computer-mediated activities.…”
Section: Technology Use In Hospitality Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research reports indicate that students exposed to face-to-face instruction and video-recorded teaching attained similar levels of culinary skills and knowledge. Importantly, however, students receiving face-to-face instruction performed significantly better on group assessments than on individual assessments, whereas students receiving video-assisted instructions did well on both group and individual pieces of assessment (Brown, Mao & Chesser, 2013). According to Oh and Park (2009) blended learning is a new delivery mode that combines face-to-face teaching using computer-mediated activities.…”
Section: Technology Use In Hospitality Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown, Mao and Chesser pointed out the interpersonal interaction in live training, and the positive effect of teamwork on team spirit and creativity. They say some methods like peer teaching, virtual meetings, appropriate discussion boards, blogsharing, social media communication, etc., could be used in gastronomy and culinary education (Brown, Mao and Chesser, 2013). Way, Ottenbacher and Harrington have mentioned "crowdsourcing" method and argued that using social networks as online communication and interaction tool will be the best solution for questions and problems by providing multiple participation (Way, Ottenbacher and Harrington, 2011).…”
Section: Gastronomy Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu açıdan bakıldığında Türkiye'deki gastronomi ve mutfak sanatları programlarının amacının da aşçılık programları gibi nitelikli "mutfak elemanı" yetiştirmek olduğu düşünülebilir ancak konu ile ilgili yapılan araştırmaların yetersizliği ve eğitimini başarı ile tamamlayan mezunlara verilecek unvan konusunda Yükseköğretim Kurulu Başkanlığı'nın (YÖK) bir kararı bulunmaması (Özdemir, 2017) ilgili programların turizm fakültesi (n=24), uygulamalı bilimler yüksekokulu (n=11), turizm ve otelcilik yüksekokulu (n=4), güzel sanatlar-sanat ve tasarım fakültesi (n=17) gibi farklı fakülte ve yüksekokullarda açılması (Yökatlas, 2018) bölümün misyonunun ne olduğu konusunda şüphe uyandırmakta, programların amacı ve gastronomi algısında belirsizliğe neden olmaktadır. Uluslararası literatür (Brown, 2005;Brown, Mao & Chesser, 2013;Cheng, vd., 2011;Harrington, Mandabach, Thibodeaux & Vanleeuwen, 2005;Hertzman, 2008;Hertzman & Stefanelli, 2008;La Lopa, 2009;Maberly & Reid, 2014;Mesch, 2012;Wollin & Gravas, 2001;Yen, Cooper & Murrmann, 2013;Zopiatis, Theodosiou & Constanti, 2014) (Brough, 2008, s. 70). Bu nedenle çalışmanın ilerleyen bölümleri mutfak eğitimi yeterliğini etkileyen faktörler ekseninde şekillenmiştir.…”
Section: Kavramsal çErçeveunclassified