2018
DOI: 10.7755/fb.116.3-4.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of length distributions of rockfishes (Sebastes spp.) from submersible and trawl surveys off central California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Growth increments were not validated during this study. However, these counts were assumed to correspond to daily ages because the formation of daily growth increments has been validated for several of these species, including S. jordani (Laidig et al, 1991), S. paucispinis , and S. goodei (Woodbury & Ralston, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growth increments were not validated during this study. However, these counts were assumed to correspond to daily ages because the formation of daily growth increments has been validated for several of these species, including S. jordani (Laidig et al, 1991), S. paucispinis , and S. goodei (Woodbury & Ralston, 1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is why hydrobiologists, as well as taxonomists and archaeologists, often rely on the shape and size of preserved or undigested otoliths to determine which species and sizes of fish were eaten by predators (Olsson and North, 1997). The relationships between the otolith and the fish have been studied by several authors (Echeveria, 1987;Campana et al, 1993;Aydin et al, 2004 andVeen et al, 2005). Also, some researchers have succeeded in measuring the duration of the reproductive cycle of fish (Seret and Opic, 2011) and calculating their age (Panfili et al, 1990) using the otolith.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%