“…Unsatisfactory specimens are ≤1.1%, and one of the most common reasons for unsatisfactory specimens was too few squamous cells [11]. In addition, some reports have stated that the LBC method is associated with a higher cancer detection rate than the conventional method [1,8,12,13,14,15], whereas other reports found no difference between both methods [2,3,4,7,9,16,17,18,19,20]. According to meta-analyses and randomized studies, the number of unsatisfactory slides was not lower, or detection of high-grade lesions was not increased compared with conventional cytology [16,17].…”