1995
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(95)00099-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of lumped and distributed models of monolith catalytic combustors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
99
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the measured rates, the pore resistance effect was estimated using Wagner-Weisz-Wheeler modulus M W [44]. With the value of 1.7228 × 10 −2 at 550 • C, which is the highest value of M W , the pore resistance is negligible in this study.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the measured rates, the pore resistance effect was estimated using Wagner-Weisz-Wheeler modulus M W [44]. With the value of 1.7228 × 10 −2 at 550 • C, which is the highest value of M W , the pore resistance is negligible in this study.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass transfer and heat transfer coefficients were evaluated from the correlations (15) for Nu and Sh numbers [44]. The reaction rate constants for the WGS Reaction (1) ( Table 3) and methanation Reaction (2) ( Table 8) were adapted to be suitable the computational domain (Table 9).…”
Section: Cell Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the dimensions of the system, the concentration and speed radial profiles are developed in a small distance and thus, only the axial direction variations are considered in the model [7], [8]. Moreover, all the honeycomb subchannels operate in the same way [9], [10], [11], and therefore, the reactor will be treated as a single channel. It is also assumed that pressure remains constant throughout the reactor [12], [13].…”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, all the honeycomb subchannels operate in the same way [9], [10], [11], and therefore, the reactor will be treated as a single channel. It is also assumed that pressure remains constant throughout the reactor [12], [13]. With respect to the thermal model, the next assumptions are considered: the temperature of the solid phase is equal to the gas phase [14], and only axial heat convection is modeled as heat transfer mechanism.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, numerical simulations of catalytic micro-combustors encompass investigations of combustion stability and performance using 1-D models with lumped heat and mass transport coefficients (Kaisare et al, 2008;Ronney, 2003), 2-D models with detailed chemistry kinetics but without heat conduction in the solid wall (Maruta et al, 2002), 2-D models with simplified chemistry kinetics accounting for heat conduction in the solid (Deshmukh et al, 2004;Stefanidis and Vlachos, 2009), and finally full 2-D CFD models where all relevant heat transfer mechanisms in the solid (including heat conduction and surface radiation heat transfer) along with detailed homogeneous and heterogeneous chemistry kinetics are accounted (Karagiannidis et al, 2007). It is emphasized that although Sherwood and Nusselt number empirical correlations have been proposed for laminar channel flows with surface catalytic reactions (Groppi et al, 1995), their universal applicability under different reacting conditions is not warranted. Moreover, 1-D models fail to describe homogeneous combustion due to the strong dependence of homogeneous reactions on the boundary layer profiles of temperature and species (Mantzaras and Benz, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%