2006 World Automation Congress 2006
DOI: 10.1109/wac.2006.376033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Mandani and Sugeno Inference Systems for a Space Fault Detection Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Further investigation of Jassbi et al confirms that Takagi-Sugeno-Kang method shows more tolerance towards input noise than Mamdani's method [15], which is an advantageous property in the problem domain of the current research. Figure 2 shows that the decrease of the inputs "Processability" and "Code Coverage" below the medium level have a drastic impact on the execution tracing quality which also reflects the expert's opinion.…”
Section: Approach Of Takagi-sugeno-kangmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Further investigation of Jassbi et al confirms that Takagi-Sugeno-Kang method shows more tolerance towards input noise than Mamdani's method [15], which is an advantageous property in the problem domain of the current research. Figure 2 shows that the decrease of the inputs "Processability" and "Code Coverage" below the medium level have a drastic impact on the execution tracing quality which also reflects the expert's opinion.…”
Section: Approach Of Takagi-sugeno-kangmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The FAHP approach is used to obtain the relative importance weightage of indicators (see sub-section on importance weightage of indicators and measures). The Mamdani FIS is applied in this study due to its comparatively simpler structure, which predicts reasonable results and also includes the intuitive and interpretable nature of the rule base (Jassbi et al 2006). The FIS consist of four components, namely; fuzzification interface, knowledge base, inference system and defuzzification interface.…”
Section: Sustainability Evaluation Framework and Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of use, the Mamdani FIS is more widely used mostly because of the reasonable results with a relatively simple structure it provides, and the intuitive interpretable nature of the rule base [20]. Since the consequents of the rules in a Sugeno FIS are not fuzzy, this interpretability is lost; however, the Sugeno FIS's rules' consequents can have as many parameters per rule as input values, which results in more degrees of freedom in the design than those of Mamdani and, in turn, provides the system's designer with more flexibility in the design of the system [21].…”
Section: Mamdani Fis Vs Sugeno Fismentioning
confidence: 99%