2016
DOI: 10.1075/lia.7.2.01van
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of maternal and child language in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants

Abstract: The present study examines the amount of input and output in congenitally hearing-impaired children with a cochlear implant (CI) and normally-hearing children (NH) and their normally-hearing mothers. The aim of the study was threefold: (a) to investigate the input provided by the two groups of mothers, (b) to investigate the output of the two groups of children, and (c) to investigate the influence of the mothers’ input on child output and expressive vocabulary size. Mothers are less influenced by their childr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
5
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are ample indications in this direction: the lowSES caregivers participating in the current study took significantly fewer turns than did their mhSES counterparts. The number of caregiver turns is a solid predictor of children’s expressive vocabulary sizes at 21 months of age (Vanormelingen, De Maeyer, & Gillis, in press), and general language development as assessed by standardized tests (Gilkerson & Richards, 2009). And, indeed, lowSES children have been found to have significantly smaller vocabularies (Fernald et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are ample indications in this direction: the lowSES caregivers participating in the current study took significantly fewer turns than did their mhSES counterparts. The number of caregiver turns is a solid predictor of children’s expressive vocabulary sizes at 21 months of age (Vanormelingen, De Maeyer, & Gillis, in press), and general language development as assessed by standardized tests (Gilkerson & Richards, 2009). And, indeed, lowSES children have been found to have significantly smaller vocabularies (Fernald et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hearing parents typically rely on spoken language (produced in the auditory modality) to communicate with their hearing children. Research has shown that the hearing parents of deaf children who have received cochlear implants provide comparable amounts of spoken language input to their child as do hearing parents of hearing children (Vanormelingen et al, 2016). Of course, the point of an implant is to help deaf children hear and thus learn spoken language, so this is not entirely surprising.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cumulative vocabulary is a standard measure to estimate children's vocabulary growth in longitudinal, spontaneous data [e.g., (18, 33, 34)]. It is determined by counting the number of new words in each consecutive data file.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%