2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2017.03.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of MCNP6-1.0 and GEANT 4-10.1 when evaluating the neutron output of a complex real world nuclear environment: The thermal neutron facility at the Tri Universities Meson facility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum difference between MCNP6.1.0 and Geant4.10.2 simulations for the four scintillators is less than 5%. These differences are mainly due to differences in cross sections libraries used by MCNP6.1.0 and Geant4.10.2 [46][47][48][49][50]. Table 3.1 compares thermal neutron capture efficiency of the four scintillators at a thickness of 2 cm, 5cm and 10 cm respectively.…”
Section: Thermal Neutronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum difference between MCNP6.1.0 and Geant4.10.2 simulations for the four scintillators is less than 5%. These differences are mainly due to differences in cross sections libraries used by MCNP6.1.0 and Geant4.10.2 [46][47][48][49][50]. Table 3.1 compares thermal neutron capture efficiency of the four scintillators at a thickness of 2 cm, 5cm and 10 cm respectively.…”
Section: Thermal Neutronsmentioning
confidence: 99%