2017
DOI: 10.18280/mmc_b.860121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of mechanical artefacts used in calibration of coordinate measuring machines (CMMs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the over-positioning in multi-pin positioning, there is the possibility of interference among the pins and holes, which may result in failed assembly. Although measuring equipment such as the Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) [3] can be employed to obtain the actual positions of holes of part, the measurement of the accumulated errors of assembled parts may not be performed owing to the poor accessibility of measurement. It is also unknown whether the two adjacent parts can be assembled, as well as the positioning accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the over-positioning in multi-pin positioning, there is the possibility of interference among the pins and holes, which may result in failed assembly. Although measuring equipment such as the Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) [3] can be employed to obtain the actual positions of holes of part, the measurement of the accumulated errors of assembled parts may not be performed owing to the poor accessibility of measurement. It is also unknown whether the two adjacent parts can be assembled, as well as the positioning accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%