1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1986.tb01285.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of mercury and digital clinical thermometers

Abstract: A primarily clinical trial has been undertaken to investigate and compare the use of mercury and digital thermometers in a ward situation. Both laboratory and clinical studies show that there is no significant difference in the average accuracy of the two types of thermometers, however there is a greater fluctuation of readings of temperature when using electronic thermometers. In clinical studies between 9 and 23% of repeated measurements using an electronic thermometer differ by 0.5 degrees C or more whilst … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The American Academy of Pediatrics now suggests their use be curtailed because of the risks of mercury poisoning (20). Electronic thermometers equilibrate in variable times (depending on if they operate in a predictive or contact equilibrium mode [4,21]), and are simple to use and read. Studies comparing electronic and mercury readings at the same body site have yielded both comparable readings (21) and readings that vary by a clinically significant amount (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American Academy of Pediatrics now suggests their use be curtailed because of the risks of mercury poisoning (20). Electronic thermometers equilibrate in variable times (depending on if they operate in a predictive or contact equilibrium mode [4,21]), and are simple to use and read. Studies comparing electronic and mercury readings at the same body site have yielded both comparable readings (21) and readings that vary by a clinically significant amount (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seus resultados relatam média de 36,17º ± 0,21ºC, extremos de 35,5º e 37,0ºC e queda de 0,15ºC/década de vida na temperatura basal média. 15,22,23 O presente estudo encontrou média e desvio-padrão semelhantes aos do estudo de Gubin et al Desde a pesquisa inicial de Wunderlich, em 1868, tem-se utilizado o termômetro de mercúrio como "padrão ouro" para aferição de temperaturas corporais, razão de seu uso no presente estudo. Há, porém, ações internacionais e locais procurando reduzir e/ou retirá-lo da prática diária dos profissionais da saúde.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Justifica-se esta observação pelo padrão de doenças, medicações e graus de nutrição e dependência física em suas casuísticas de institucionalizados. 7,17,18,22,23 Cabe, assim, a proposta de Yoshikawa e Norman 1 7 7 1 7 7 1 7 7 1 7 7 Temperatura basal em idosos asilados persistente da temperatura corporal em pelo menos 2ºF (1,1ºC) sobre valores basais, independentemente da técnica de aferição (oral, retal, axilar ou auricular); (2) temperaturas orais iguais ou maiores a 99ºF (37,2ºC) e (3) temperaturas retais iguais ou maiores a 99,5ºF (37,5ºC).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…In most medical centres oral electromc thermometry is used for routine temperature measurements The claimed advantages of this method include improved hygiene, less hazards (no mercury waste) and saving of Ume Previous studies have not adequately assessed the reliability and accuracy of oral thermometry Many investigators have focused on jn vivo studies documenting high precision and accuracy of oral thermometers under such circumstances (Nichols et al 1966, Davis et al 1986 Several of these investigations have concentrated on techmcal and biological problems such as comparison between different tjrpes of digital thermometers, investigations of optimum time and placement in the oral cavity, influences of hjrperventilation, age, and dental protheoses, lnfiuences of exogenous factors such as hot baths and cold/warm liquids before measurements (Erickson 1980, Baker et al 1984, Davis et al 1986, Shanks et al 1983, Hanm et al 1988…”
Section: Temperature Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%