2012
DOI: 10.2991/978-94-91216-77-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Methods for Selecting Preferred Solutions in Multiobjective Decision Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of clustering techniques is a common approach to help make the selection of solution from a large Pareto optimal set more manageable (Aguirre and Taboada, 2011;Zio and Bazzo, 2012;Chaudhari et al, 2013). Clustering aims to group objects with similar characteristics into distinct partitions, or clusters.…”
Section: Filtering Representative Solutions With Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of clustering techniques is a common approach to help make the selection of solution from a large Pareto optimal set more manageable (Aguirre and Taboada, 2011;Zio and Bazzo, 2012;Chaudhari et al, 2013). Clustering aims to group objects with similar characteristics into distinct partitions, or clusters.…”
Section: Filtering Representative Solutions With Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a posteriori methods, a representative set of Pareto optimal solutions is first found and then the decision maker (DM) should choose one of the obtained points using higher-level information. The DM is expected to be an expert in the problem domain although several decision making support methods are developed to aid the DM in the selection of the preferred solutions 15 16 17 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of a priori and post priori methods of supporting decision makers faced with a Pareto front of solutions to choose from is presented in [4], the authors use a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to solve a multi-objective control problem, the output of which is a non-dominated front of potential solutions. Methods of decision support include self-organising maps and subtractive clustering, fuzzy scoring and data envelopment analysis (all post priori approaches) and a guided multi-objective genetic algorithm (a priori).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%