A comparison of methods for whole-genome QTL mapping using dense markers in four livestock species

Abstract

BackgroundWith dense genotyping, many choices exist for methods to detect quantitative trait loci (QTL) in livestock populations. However, no across-species study has been conducted on the performance of different methods using real data. We compared three methods that correct for relatedness either implicitly or explicitly: linkage and linkage disequilibrium haplotype-based analysis (LDLA), efficient mixed-model association (EMMA) analysis, and Bayesian whole-genome regression (BayesC). We analyzed one chromosome in each of five datasets (dairy cattle, beef cattle, sheep, horses, and pigs) using real genotypes based on dense single nucleotide polymorphisms and phenotypes. The P values corrected for multiple testing or Bayes factors greater than 150 were considered to be significant. To complete the real data study, we also simulated quantitative trait loci (QTL) for the same datasets based on the real genotypes. Several scenarios were chosen, with different QTL effects and linkage disequilibrium patterns. A pseudo-null statistical distribution was chosen to make the significance thresholds comparable across methods.ResultsFor the real data, the three methods generally agreed within 1 or 2 cM for the locations of QTL regions and disagreed when no signals were significant (e.g. in pigs). For certain datasets, LDLA had more significant signals than EMMA or BayesC, but they were concentrated around the same peaks. Therefore, the three methods detected approximately the same number of QTL regions. For the simulated data, LDLA was slightly less powerful and accurate than either EMMA or BayesC but this depended strongly on how thresholds were set in the simulations.ConclusionsAll three methods performed similarly for real and simulated data. No method was clearly superior across all datasets or for any particular dataset. For computational efficiency and ease of interpretation, EMMA is recommended, but using more than one method is suggested.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-015-0087-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A comparison of methods to estimate genomic relationships using pedigree and markers in livestock populations

“…Legarra et al . () obtained similar results when comparing methods to detect QTL in four livestock species using markers, whether a genomic or a pedigree‐based numerator relationship matrix was used. Yet, no further investigation on the subject has been carried out so far.…”

Whole genome structural analysis of Caribbean hair sheep reveals quantitative link to West African ancestry

“…Dense genotyping also provides a means of mapping desired traits to specific regions of the genome designated quantitative trait loci (QTL)[22]. This identifies not only phenotypes controlled by single genes, but complex traits produced by the interaction of many genes[1, 4, 23,24].…”

Application of a Bayesian dominance model improves power in quantitative trait genome-wide association analysis

“…Inference was drawn for each window by considering these window SNPs jointly. Legarra et al [9] compared linkage and linkage disequilibrium analysis (known as LDLA), single-marker mixed model association analysis, and Bayesian whole-genome association analysis using a real data structure. They did not report a clear superiority of one method, but recommended to apply more than one method to real data.…”