1961
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1961)089<0401:acomfc>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Methods for Computing Daily Mean Values of Dry Bulb Temperature, Dew Point, and Relative Humidity

Abstract: Ihy bulb temperature: synoptic mean us. 24-hr. 'mean. m e a n and standard deviation of daily departures. 5 years of record, AvPrage departure of mean of 4 synoptic observations jrom 24-hr. o v. The daily Inems were rounded to one clecinlal to tletermine the daily differences which were then rourltled to whole numbers. These daily differences (Id, 2d, and 3c) for each rrlont'll st each stat'ion for the five years were then accumulated in a frequency table. The class intervals were 1' F. for dry bulb and dew po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most striking similarities between the regression lines in figures 1 The few exceptions to these trends usually occur in samples confined within small ranges. At Nantucket in July, the only example in which the regression line slopes downward, only one-tenth of the midrange values are below 70 percent relative humidity and none below 60 percent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The most striking similarities between the regression lines in figures 1 The few exceptions to these trends usually occur in samples confined within small ranges. At Nantucket in July, the only example in which the regression line slopes downward, only one-tenth of the midrange values are below 70 percent relative humidity and none below 60 percent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%