1986
DOI: 10.1016/0309-1740(86)90020-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of methods to estimate water-holding capacity in post-rigor porcine muscle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meat colour was assessed using a CR-410 minolta chromameter (Konica-Minolta, Tokyo, Japan) on a freshly cut cross-section of the muscle after 30 min of blooming at 48C, and Hunter l*, a*, b* and C values were recorded. Pressure loss (%) and drip loss (%) was determined according to Kauffman et al (1986) and Lundstrom and Malmfors (1985), respectively, and three duplicate samples per pig. Warner-Bratzler shear force of meat was measured according to Ryu and Kim (2005), and six muscle strips (1 cm 3 1 cm 3 2 cm) as duplicate samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meat colour was assessed using a CR-410 minolta chromameter (Konica-Minolta, Tokyo, Japan) on a freshly cut cross-section of the muscle after 30 min of blooming at 48C, and Hunter l*, a*, b* and C values were recorded. Pressure loss (%) and drip loss (%) was determined according to Kauffman et al (1986) and Lundstrom and Malmfors (1985), respectively, and three duplicate samples per pig. Warner-Bratzler shear force of meat was measured according to Ryu and Kim (2005), and six muscle strips (1 cm 3 1 cm 3 2 cm) as duplicate samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water-holding capacity of meat was measured using the method suggested by Kauffman et al (1986) and Trout (1998). A 0.5 g of meat sample was weighed and placed between two filter papers.…”
Section: Determination Of Water Holding Capacity Of Meatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, duplicate pH values of each sample were measured with a pH meter (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The water-holding capacity (WHC) was measured based on the procedure described in a previous report (Kauffman et al 1986). Briefly, a 0.3-g sample was pressed at 3000 psi for 3 min on a 125-mm-diameter filter paper.…”
Section: Sampling and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%