2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00948-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of methylene blue and lymphazurin in breast cancer sentinel node mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
84
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…one study demonstrate an identification rate of 98.7% in 329 early breast cancer patients 65 . Other studies have shown similar identification rates [73][74][75] . The other advantages of using Methylene blue include its lower cost 74 and wider availability.…”
Section: Avoidance Of Risk By Using Methylene Blue or Corticosteroid supporting
confidence: 65%
“…one study demonstrate an identification rate of 98.7% in 329 early breast cancer patients 65 . Other studies have shown similar identification rates [73][74][75] . The other advantages of using Methylene blue include its lower cost 74 and wider availability.…”
Section: Avoidance Of Risk By Using Methylene Blue or Corticosteroid supporting
confidence: 65%
“…isosulphan blue dye (Lymphazurin 1 %) and methylene blue, or technetium 99m tagged with sulphur colloid or antimony, in sub-areolar, intradermal, peri-tumoral or intra-tumoral location of the breast. In Europe, many centres use technetium 99m tagged with colloidal albumin [4][5][6][7]. Many authors have demonstrated that the combination of radioisotope and a blue dye for lymphatic mapping improves the sentinel lymph node identification probability compared to the use of a single tracer [8].…”
Section: Methods Of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,13 Although methylene blue is more readily available and considerably less expensive than the others, some authors claim that it diffuses more rapidly in peripheral tissues, staining a larger portion of the breast with the blue dye and, to a certain extent, hampering the procedure. [14][15][16] Other authors have reported similar accuracy and sentinel lymph node detection rates with methylene blue and with patent blue. 13,17 There appears to be a lower risk of anaphylaxis with methylene blue compared to the other dyes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In fact, the few published studies available comparing the two methods failed to show any difference between them. 15,20 Considering a confidence level of 5% and a power of the test of 80%, a total of 116 patients would be required, divided into the two groups. To compensate for any possible losses, 142 patients were enrolled to the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%