1979
DOI: 10.1109/tcom.1979.1094370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Modulation Techniques for Digital Radio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the comparison in (Oetting, 1979) shows, on-off-keying (OOK) is the simplest modulation scheme for digital radio transmission. A tuned RF receiver is one of the simplest architectures (Griggs, 2012).…”
Section: Design Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the comparison in (Oetting, 1979) shows, on-off-keying (OOK) is the simplest modulation scheme for digital radio transmission. A tuned RF receiver is one of the simplest architectures (Griggs, 2012).…”
Section: Design Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other low-power receivers use FSK modulation [9,[12][13][14][15], which is slightly more interferer-robust than OOK modulation [27]. Because the frequency reference needs to be stable, most FSK receivers use power consuming PLLs [9].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the complexity, the more stringent the receiver and transmitter requirements on various performance parameters, for example error vector magnitude (EVM), phase noise and I/Q imbalance. Figure 3.1 shows the complexity of many digital modulation types that are discussed in [27]. When comparing the modulation complexity shown in figure 3.…”
Section: Modulation Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, no experimental results have been found for [24] which could be used for comparison purposes.…”
Section: Carrier Interference Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%