2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of monitoring systems used for Ceratitis species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TM is an effective lure for surveying and monitoring activities for male Mediterranean fruit flies (Grout et al 2011) and members of the Ceratitis FAR complex (Virgilio et al 2008) including Ceratitis rosa . Ceratitis cosyra males are not attracted to TM but to TA (White and Elson-Harris 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TM is an effective lure for surveying and monitoring activities for male Mediterranean fruit flies (Grout et al 2011) and members of the Ceratitis FAR complex (Virgilio et al 2008) including Ceratitis rosa . Ceratitis cosyra males are not attracted to TM but to TA (White and Elson-Harris 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…food attractant) for encouraging movement in the semi-field environment. When trapping for C. capitata, Biolure w has been shown to have the greatest recapture rate of both sexes compared with sex pheromone-based lures [41]. This is because Tephritids in general have limited access to protein in their natural diet despite this being essential for reaching sexual maturity, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flies from each treatment group were marked with one of the three fluorescent powders ( pink, blue and yellow) that were randomly assigned prior to each release. A three-component protein pheromone attractant (ammonium acetate, trimethylamine hydrochloride and 1,4-diaminobutane; Biolurew, Chempac, Paarl, South Africa) that attracts both sexes of C. capitata [41] was opened for 10 min at one end of a 15 Â 3 m rectangular greenhouse before being sealed into an airtight container to create a pheromone gradient. Flies were then released from ground level at the opposite end of the empty greenhouse and allowed to move without human interference.…”
Section: (B) Semi-field Releasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the best trap density for monitoring these insects in citrus is unknown and may depend on the fruit fly population. Although there are some indications on control thresholds for fruit flies , little research has been done on the relationship between insect trap captures and the damage caused (AGUNLOYE, 1987;UCHÔA-FERNANDES et al, 2003;GROUT et al, 2011). The objectives of this research were to evaluate the effect of pH of the attractant suspension and also estimate the control threshold for C. capitata at four trap densities, based on captures and fruit damage in Hamlin variety (sweet orange).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1998;NASCIMENTO et al, 2000;SCOZ et al, 2006) or other components, such as trimedlure for C. capitata (GROUT et al, 2011). McPhail traps with hydrolyzed proteins, or similar products, have been the most used, despite being considered expensive, difficult to use and inefficient (ALUJA, 1994), because they are able to capture different tephritid species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%