2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2019.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of multiple Rosetta data sets and 3D model calculations of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko coma around equinox (May 2015)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we have used the modeling approach (and in particular our DRAG3D model for the dust coma) described in detail in Marschall et al [16]. This approach has been successfully applied for the analysis and interpretation of multiple Rosetta instruments, in particular ROSINA, MIRO (Microwave Instrument for the Rosetta Orbiter), VIRTIS (Visible and Infrared Thermal Imaging Spectrometer), and OSIRIS [16][17][18][19]. While in previous work we have applied this approach to specific epochs of the Rosetta mission, we have employed it here to cover the entire mission period to study longer-term processes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we have used the modeling approach (and in particular our DRAG3D model for the dust coma) described in detail in Marschall et al [16]. This approach has been successfully applied for the analysis and interpretation of multiple Rosetta instruments, in particular ROSINA, MIRO (Microwave Instrument for the Rosetta Orbiter), VIRTIS (Visible and Infrared Thermal Imaging Spectrometer), and OSIRIS [16][17][18][19]. While in previous work we have applied this approach to specific epochs of the Rosetta mission, we have employed it here to cover the entire mission period to study longer-term processes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it has been shown (Liao 2017) that lateral expansion will smooth out source inhomogeneities on scales up to the mean free path and hence the COPS data cannot be used to infer surface source distributions accurately. MIRO can make up for this deficiency, in principle (Marschall et al 2019), but the inversion of the measured lines is far more complicated than in a bound atmosphere application and is compromised by the relatively broad beam width. One important aspect that might yet be resolved is the temperature of the gas at source which may be higher than the free sublimation temperature as a result of interaction between the gas and the surface layer(s).…”
Section: Innermost Gas and Dust Comae Properties And Surface Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to use these data sets together to constrain models (e.g. Marschall et al 2019;Tenishev et al 2016) of the surface activity distribution. However, from the work so far, it is not obvious that a satisfactory unique solution can be obtained even for optimum cases.…”
Section: Innermost Gas and Dust Comae Properties And Surface Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coma models have been previously used to fit the ROSINA data (see Bieler et al 2015b;Fougere et al 2016), while Läuter et al (2019) applied an inverse coma model to study the spatial distribution of gas sources from ROSINA DFMS/COPS measurements. Marschall et al (2019) proposed a comparison of the ROSINA, MIRO, Visible InfraRed Thermal Imaging Spectrometer (VIRTIS) and Optical, Spectroscopic, and Infrared Remote Imaging System (OSIRIS) observations from May 2015 and an insolation-driven model constrained by MIRO's measurements. Most of these models focused on the dominant species, H 2 O, and showed that a purely insolation driven model could not reproduce all coma measurements, leading to potentially heterogeneous activity depending on the regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%