2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24652-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of node vaccination strategies to halt SIR epidemic spreading in real-world complex networks

Abstract: We compared seven node vaccination strategies in twelve real-world complex networks. The node vaccination strategies are modeled as node removal on networks. We performed node vaccination strategies both removing nodes according to the initial network structure, i.e., non-adaptive approach, and performing partial node rank recalculation after node removal, i.e., semi-adaptive approach. To quantify the efficacy of each vaccination strategy, we used three epidemic spread indicators: the size of the largest conne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alvarez-Zuzek et al studied disease transmission in multiplex networks by opinion exchanges on vaccination, which concludes that the exchange of views among individuals had an impact on the vaccination rate [17]. Sartori et al explored the effectiveness of vaccination by comparing the vaccination strategies of seven nodes in twelve real-world complex networks [18]. Cremonini et al proposed a new agent group dynamic model of network transmission to study the dynamics of disease transmission [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alvarez-Zuzek et al studied disease transmission in multiplex networks by opinion exchanges on vaccination, which concludes that the exchange of views among individuals had an impact on the vaccination rate [17]. Sartori et al explored the effectiveness of vaccination by comparing the vaccination strategies of seven nodes in twelve real-world complex networks [18]. Cremonini et al proposed a new agent group dynamic model of network transmission to study the dynamics of disease transmission [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centrality-targeting is one of the spatial strategies used for strategic implementation of disease control interventions and has shown to be superior to risk-targeting when seeking to reduce epidemic contagion, especially in resource-constrained areas affected by epidemics caused by highly transmissible pathogens 61 , 62 , as is the case of FMD and other TADs affecting livestock 63 . For instance, spatial vaccination strategies informed by centrality-based prioritisation have shown to be effective at halting epidemic spread by reducing the size of the largest connected component, total number of individuals infected and the maximum number of simultaneous infections during an outbreak 64 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Node centrality measures were first developed in social network analysis to identify influential persons in social networks [1,67,68]. Ranking network nodes according to their network structural embedding helps address a Frontiers in Physics frontiersin.org variety of problems in social networks, such as identifying the most influential persons in a friendship network [5], selecting the influential spreaders of news and information [69], and finding the most important nodes for vaccination to halt epidemic spreading, [17,18,70], etc [66]. Many node centrality measures conceived for binary networks were then adapted to rank nodes in WSNs.…”
Section: Measures Of Node Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In criminal networks, NR may describe how arresting criminals affects the structure of interpersonal relationships in crime with the aim of developing policies to halt criminal activities [134]. Finally, in social contact networks within which a disease can spread, NR may simulate the effect of node vaccination [18] and quarantine [128] on the spread of the disease.…”
Section: Node Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation