2014
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of non-integrating reprogramming methods

Abstract: Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs1–3) are useful in disease modeling and drug discovery, and they promise to provide a new generation of cell-based therapeutics. To date there has been no systematic evaluation of the most widely used techniques for generating integration-free hiPSCs. Here we compare Sendai-viral (SeV)4, episomal (Epi)5 and mRNA transfection mRNA6 methods using a number of criteria. All methods generated high-quality hiPSCs, but significant differences existed in aneuploidy rates, re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
415
4
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 440 publications
(443 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
19
415
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, when enhanced transgene expression was achieved by including the woodchuck hepatitis virus post-transcriptional regulatory element in the design, an improved efficiency of reprogramming in human cord blood CD34+ cells was observed [225]. Moreover, these data corroborate evidence that highlights the importance of careful screening of iPSC clones for the presence of transgene integration or persistent expression of exogenous sequences [46,186], as one of the iPSC clones (out of six screened clones) showed the integration of one of the reprogramming vectors.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, when enhanced transgene expression was achieved by including the woodchuck hepatitis virus post-transcriptional regulatory element in the design, an improved efficiency of reprogramming in human cord blood CD34+ cells was observed [225]. Moreover, these data corroborate evidence that highlights the importance of careful screening of iPSC clones for the presence of transgene integration or persistent expression of exogenous sequences [46,186], as one of the iPSC clones (out of six screened clones) showed the integration of one of the reprogramming vectors.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This approximate the efficiency observed with the integrating viral vectors which have the highest efficiency of reprogramming; however, its advantage is negated by the requirement for repeated transfection [41] and the considerable failure rate in reprogramming [186]. Nevertheless, episomal vectors remain a viable option for reprogramming to pluripotency [186] that can be compatible with clinical translation [221].…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The conversion efficiency of fibroblasts into an NSC state using episomal vectors is, however, relatively lower than that of retroviral vector-mediated conversion potentially due to the relatively low transfection efficiency of episomal vectors (15,25). Thus, further optimization is necessary for enhancing the reprogramming efficiency, for instance, by using small molecules as in previous iPSC studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%