2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of non-invasive imaging modalities: Infrared thermography, spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis and laser Doppler imaging for the assessment of adult burns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for study exclusion during the final review were as follows: review article (n = 7), incomplete data (n = 26), letter (n = 2), or case report (n = 2). The remaining 10 non-randomized studies were included in the final analysis [1, [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for study exclusion during the final review were as follows: review article (n = 7), incomplete data (n = 26), letter (n = 2), or case report (n = 2). The remaining 10 non-randomized studies were included in the final analysis [1, [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses a low-intensity monochromatic laser beam to scan across a tissue surface and determine flux of blood cells moving through the dermal microvasculature [14,15]. For this reason, LDPI revealed to be a precious evidence-based adjunct to clinical evaluation of burn depth [16], as well as alterations due to systemic sclerosis [17], scleroderma, and primary Raynaud's phenomenon [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than a decade later, the diagnostic technique was first tested on a large series of burn patients in a study by Hackett et al This study demonstrated that it was more accurate than clinical evaluation (75% vs 90%). Many studies have been conducted since, using a wide range of thermal imagers, overall reporting promising results . However, cumbersome and low‐resolution equipment hampered the regular use of thermography in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal imagers display the temperature distribution of the skin in a thermal image by detecting infrared emission from the skin. Several studies have examined the diagnostic role of different types of thermal imagers in burn wound assessment . These studies concluded that areas of deeply burned skin appear colder on a thermal image than unaffected skin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%