1998
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Noncontingent Reinforcement and Sensory Extinction as Treatments for Self‐injurious Behavior

Abstract: We compared the effects of two treatments, noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) and sensory extinction (EXT), on the self-injurious behavior (SIB) exhibited by 3 individuals with developmental disabilities. Results of a functional analysis indicated that their SIB was not maintained by social reinforcement, as indicated by undifferentiated responding across assessment conditions or higher rates of responding in the alone condition. Prior to treatment, leisure probes were conducted to identify highly preferred ite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, we retrieved the raw data of eight studies having two to four subjects. We combined the studies of Lindberg, Iwata, and Kahng (1999); Roscoe, Iwata, and Goh (1998); Thompson, Iwata, Conners, and Roscoe (1999); Roane, Piazza, Sgro, Volkert, and Anderson (2001) Thompson, & Lindberg (2000); and Zhou, Goff, & Iwata (2000). The SAS codes used for the estimation of the treatment effects over subjects and over studies are described in Appendix B.…”
Section: Empirical Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, we retrieved the raw data of eight studies having two to four subjects. We combined the studies of Lindberg, Iwata, and Kahng (1999); Roscoe, Iwata, and Goh (1998); Thompson, Iwata, Conners, and Roscoe (1999); Roane, Piazza, Sgro, Volkert, and Anderson (2001) Thompson, & Lindberg (2000); and Zhou, Goff, & Iwata (2000). The SAS codes used for the estimation of the treatment effects over subjects and over studies are described in Appendix B.…”
Section: Empirical Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research suggests that blocking the reinforcing consequence of the response by using sensory extinction can lead to the reduction of behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement (Aiken & Salzberg, 1984;Kennedy & Souza, 1995;Rincover, 1978). For example, Roscoe, Iwata, and Goh (1998) used sensory extinction in the form of gloves and protective sleeves to attenuate the stimulation produced by self-injury that was believed to be maintained by sensory consequences. In the case of stereotypic vocalizations, Aiken and Salzberg (1984) used sensory extinction in the form of white noise via headphones to reduce the stereotypic noises of two children with autism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a typical NCR procedure for socially maintained behavior, the reinforcer responsible for behavioral maintenance is delivered to the individual on a time-based schedule. NCR has also been reported an effective treatment for aberrant behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement (e.g., Piazza, Adelinis, Hanley, Goh, & Delia, 2000;Roscoe, Iwata, & Goh, 1998). In these procedures, an individual is typically given continuous, 1 as opposed to timebased, access to one or more leisure items identified from a stimulus preference assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%