2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0963-8695(02)00061-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of nondestructive evaluation methods for bridge deck assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if the position of these features are unknown, this becomes a difficult task. As has been seen in previous literature, GPR has been used to identify the position of these supports [8,42]. This paper illustrates, however, that the presence of moisture has a negative impact on the ability of GPR to accurately map the support.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, if the position of these features are unknown, this becomes a difficult task. As has been seen in previous literature, GPR has been used to identify the position of these supports [8,42]. This paper illustrates, however, that the presence of moisture has a negative impact on the ability of GPR to accurately map the support.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…A small impulse hammer strikes the surface of the sample and information is recorded in the location of the strike and on the reflected signal using an accelerometer placed 50-75 mm from the impact point. Fast Fourier transform (FFT) is applied to this information [8,9]. The impact echo technique is useful in measuring and detecting defects in plate-like structures such as bridge decks, slabs and walls and in bar-like structures such as circular, square and rectangular columns, as well as in the detection of defects in I-girders [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The waves reflected from internal changes in acoustic impedance or external boundaries and recorded on the surface, where the impact was generated, give information about the structure using signal interpretation techniques normally based on spectral analysis [10]. Testing with this method can be time consuming and only allows for one signal pair to be sent and received per scan.…”
Section: Elastic Wave-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os ensaios não destrutivos fornecem informações relevantes do estado da estrutura (McCann e Forde, 2001), o que permite avaliar rapidamente e eficazmente os danos (Chang;Flatau;Liu, 2003) e dessa forma evitar o colapso prematuro e imprevisível (Rehman et al, 2016). Vários pesquisadores têm demostrado a aplicação destes métodos para a inspeção e a avaliação de estruturas, fornecendo orientações dos seus usos (Clark;McCann;Forde, 2003;Scott et al, 2003;Meola 2007). McCann e Forde (2001) apresentam uma variedade de métodos não destrutivos adequados para obras de construção civil, e, especificamente Rehman et al (2016), apresenta em detalhe os ensaios não destrutivos para a inspeção de pontes.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified