1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00918379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of objective classroom measures and teacher ratings of attention deficit disorder

Abstract: Children identified as Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) on the basis of teacher ratings using the SNAP Rating Scale were compared to non-ADD children on objective classroom measures including observations of classroom behavior, examination of the organization of children's desks, and scoring of daily academic work. Analyses provided some support for the ability of the objective measures to differentiate between teacher-identified ADD and non-ADD children, though there was considerable overlap on the distributi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the ADHD-specific rating scales that were reviewed, the ADHD Index and the DSM-IV Symptoms Scale of the 1997 revision of the Conners' Rating Scale 30 and the Hyperactivity and Inattention Subscales of the SNAP Checklist 32 performed well in discriminating between children with ADHD and normal controls. It should be noted, however, that while parent-or teacher-completed broad-band scales are not recommended to specifically diagnose ADHD, global rating scales may be useful to screen for co-occurring problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the ADHD-specific rating scales that were reviewed, the ADHD Index and the DSM-IV Symptoms Scale of the 1997 revision of the Conners' Rating Scale 30 and the Hyperactivity and Inattention Subscales of the SNAP Checklist 32 performed well in discriminating between children with ADHD and normal controls. It should be noted, however, that while parent-or teacher-completed broad-band scales are not recommended to specifically diagnose ADHD, global rating scales may be useful to screen for co-occurring problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, useful criterion measures for Hyperactivity-Impulsivity may have included direct observations of out-of-seat and callingout behaviors. Also, a desk check for organization (Atkins, Pelham, & Licht, 1985) may have provided a useful criterion measure for the Inattention factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During all of the Saturday activities, trained undergraduate observers recorded on-task and disruptive behavior using an adaptation of the COCADD observational coding system (Atkins, Pelham, & Licht, 1988) that has been used in many studies of classroom functioning in children with ADHD (Pelham, Fabiano, & Massetti, 2005;. Individual observation categories used in this study included on-task behavior in the classroom and disruptive behavior during board game and recess periods.…”
Section: Dbdmentioning
confidence: 99%