2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of off-line laser scanning measurement capability with coordinate measuring machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dimensions and geometric tolerances, as the most fundamental process parameters of mechanical parts, have a significant effect on the mechanical properties of the parts and the fit between the parts 28 . A three-coordinate measuring machine can accurately measure the dimensions and geometric tolerances of parts 29 . This study used a threecoordinate measuring machine (ZEISS CONTURA) to measure the diameter ∅13±0.02mm and roundness O0.01mm of the structural common specimens.…”
Section: Measurement Methods For Dimensional and Geometric Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimensions and geometric tolerances, as the most fundamental process parameters of mechanical parts, have a significant effect on the mechanical properties of the parts and the fit between the parts 28 . A three-coordinate measuring machine can accurately measure the dimensions and geometric tolerances of parts 29 . This study used a threecoordinate measuring machine (ZEISS CONTURA) to measure the diameter ∅13±0.02mm and roundness O0.01mm of the structural common specimens.…”
Section: Measurement Methods For Dimensional and Geometric Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The examples of currently applied coordinate measuring systems are coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) [3,4] with touch and non-contact measuring probes, photogrammetry systems, computed tomographs [5], measuring arms [6] and CNC machine tools equipped with measuring probes [4]. The capabilities of the selected laser measuring system were verified by the authors of the work [7]. They compared the measurement results of the considered non-contact system to the results of measurements obtained by using a CMM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements conducted by using a CMM can be performed in two modes -contact and non-contact. Altinisik B. et al [10] found that the choice of the type of a measuring system mainly depends on the accuracy of measurements, as well as on the complexity of the geometry of a tested object. In the case of measurements of a cutting tool, it is reasonable to use a non-contact measuring system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%