2018
DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Optical, Electrochemical, Magnetic, and Colorimetric Point-of-Care Biosensors for Infectious Disease Diagnosis

Abstract: Each year, infectious diseases are responsible for millions of deaths, most of which occur in the rural areas of developing countries. Many of the infectious disease diagnostic tools used today require a great deal of time, a laboratory setting, and trained personnel. Due to this, the need for effective point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tools is greatly increasing with an emphasis on affordability, portability, sensitivity, specificity, timeliness, and ease of use. In this Review, we discuss the various diagnosti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
117
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
0
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While lateral flow devices are the most common, the trend in research goes towards devices with higher complexity, which are able to handle more complicated samples, can multiplex and detect challenging analytes [ 6 ]. The greater complexity of these devices is shown in their mechanisms of action, which are often optical, electro(chemical) or magnetic [ 8 ], but also include other mode of actions—e.g., thermal sensor systems [ 9 , 10 ]. Optical systems include more straightforward UV/Vis or fluorescence sensors, as well as more complex systems using quantum dot and surface-plasmon-resonance technology or even genetically encoded biosensors [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While lateral flow devices are the most common, the trend in research goes towards devices with higher complexity, which are able to handle more complicated samples, can multiplex and detect challenging analytes [ 6 ]. The greater complexity of these devices is shown in their mechanisms of action, which are often optical, electro(chemical) or magnetic [ 8 ], but also include other mode of actions—e.g., thermal sensor systems [ 9 , 10 ]. Optical systems include more straightforward UV/Vis or fluorescence sensors, as well as more complex systems using quantum dot and surface-plasmon-resonance technology or even genetically encoded biosensors [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid diagnosis of important arboviruses-borne diseases such as dengue, chikungunya, zika, and yellow fever is essential in order to reduce and avoid further dissemination of the infections within the general population (Patterson et al, 2016). The WHO has emphasized the importance of developing point-of-care (POC) tests that are ASSURED (Affordable, Sensitive, Specific, Userfriendly, Robust and rapid, Equipment-free, and Deliverable) (Pashchenko et al, 2018). An ideal technique for the on-site detection of arboviruses should have these characteristics and enable early detection of the disease.…”
Section: Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing the optical probed volume often comes with the need of using nanostructures, whose fabrication requires electron beam lithography and cleanroom procedures, which are neither easy nor costeffective to scale. Although significant progress has been made in this direction and many point of care detection platforms have been demonstrated [65,145,146], these devices still need to be validated for reproducible and accurate on-field operation. In addition, many portable technologies still suffer from insufficient sensitivity to be able to perform early diagnosis [147].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%