2002
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of parallel implementation of explicit DG and central difference method

Abstract: SUMMARYMassive parallel computers have become more attractive for advanced numerical simulations since standard libraries for communication and synchronization; for example MPI have facilitated program development. The present paper discusses two parallel explicit time integration methods for wave propagation problems; the central di erence method and the explicit version of the P1-P1 discontinuous galerkin (DG) method. Based on the MIMD model, where data decomposition is accomplished by element-based grid par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many suitable explicit-integration algorithms used in structural wave propagation problems. [24][25][26][27][28][29] In this work we only apply the commonly used centered difference method. There are several possible re-formulations, cited for instance in Reference 26, and Algorithm 1 describes a variant particularly efficient with a diagonal damping matrix, which is what we assume in the examples below.…”
Section: Explicit Dynamics Of Linear Wave Propagation In Shell Struct...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are many suitable explicit-integration algorithms used in structural wave propagation problems. [24][25][26][27][28][29] In this work we only apply the commonly used centered difference method. There are several possible re-formulations, cited for instance in Reference 26, and Algorithm 1 describes a variant particularly efficient with a diagonal damping matrix, which is what we assume in the examples below.…”
Section: Explicit Dynamics Of Linear Wave Propagation In Shell Struct...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many suitable explicit‐integration algorithms used in structural wave propagation problems 24‐29 . In this work we only apply the commonly used centered difference method.…”
Section: Explicit Dynamics Of Linear Wave Propagation In Shell Struct...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of parallel computers and improvements in computer hardware has been of significant importance [29]. A dynamic event has a key characteristic that the incident pulse duration is very small in the order of microseconds that makes the frequency content of pulse very high (in the order of kHz).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes the system size enormously large. But in an explicit analysis, storage of large matrices is avoided with the added advantage of not requiring to solve linear algebraic equations [29]. Explicit methods are also conditionally stable, and so the time step size must be below a critical value that is dependent on the size of the smallest finite element [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En adición, este método es fiable para los problemas que involucren impacto-contacto. Para aprovechar al máximo una formulación explícita se lleva a cabo una diagonalización de la matriz de masa del sistema, que se conserva durante todo el cálculo, de tal manera que la solución se puede obtener sin resolver ningún sistema de ecuaciones [124], a no ser que cambie la topología de la malla, por ejemplo, cuando se refina o se inserta una fractura en la misma, por lo que hay que recalcular dicha matriz nuevamente.…”
Section: Los Principales Métodos Integración Temporal Se Dividen En D...unclassified