2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of past small dam removals in highly sediment-impacted systems in the U.S.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data provide valuable insight on how a river evolves when nearly a century of a mixed grain size sediment deposit is exposed in two concurrent, phased dam removals in the same watershed. While published channel evolution models (Morris and Fan, 1998;Doyle et al, 2002;Pizzuto, 2002;Cannatelli and Curran, 2012) and empirical relationships (Sawaske and Freyberg, 2012) have already identified key physical processes and variables important in a dam removal, they were based on experience from small, mostly instantaneous dam removals that respond over short time frames. Previous studies highlight the need for incorporation of more quantitative data and large-scale dam removal cases to extend our understanding and help improve predictive capabilities and sediment management decisions for future dam removal cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data provide valuable insight on how a river evolves when nearly a century of a mixed grain size sediment deposit is exposed in two concurrent, phased dam removals in the same watershed. While published channel evolution models (Morris and Fan, 1998;Doyle et al, 2002;Pizzuto, 2002;Cannatelli and Curran, 2012) and empirical relationships (Sawaske and Freyberg, 2012) have already identified key physical processes and variables important in a dam removal, they were based on experience from small, mostly instantaneous dam removals that respond over short time frames. Previous studies highlight the need for incorporation of more quantitative data and large-scale dam removal cases to extend our understanding and help improve predictive capabilities and sediment management decisions for future dam removal cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the number of dams being removed nationwide, few studies have systematically evaluated the effects of dam removal on rivers and their ecosystems. The few existing geomorphic studies of dam removals mainly report on removals of small dams and do not span a wide range of river types, sediment releases, or sediment compositions (Doyle and others, 2003a;Ahearn and Dahlgren, 2005;MacBroom, 2005;Cheng and Granata, 2007;Evans, 2007;Rumschlag and Peck, 2007;Straub, 2007;Walter and Tullos, 2010;Pearson and others, 2011;Sawaske and Freyberg, 2012). …”
Section: ; Us Army Corps Of Engineers 2009)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the N1100 dams removed in the United States thus far (American Rivers, 2014) have been b10 m high and impounded modest volumes (b1 million m 3 ) of reservoir sediment (e.g., Cheng and Granata, 2007;Burroughs et al, 2009;Pearson et al, 2011;Sawaske and Freyberg, 2012). Within the past decade, several larger dam removals have provided substantially more information to scientists and managers concerning the physical and biological responses to such events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%