2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1460979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Penny Stock Initial Public Offerings and Reverse Mergers as Alternative Mechanisms to Going Public

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They show that these companies outperform matched IPO companies in the short run, but exhibit comparable performance three years following the going public decision. Floros and Shastri (2010) compare and contrast the decision to go public using RMs versus penny stock IPOs (PSIPOs). They hypothesize that RM companies are highly information asymmetric, since they do not conduct a public offering at the consummation of the deal.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They show that these companies outperform matched IPO companies in the short run, but exhibit comparable performance three years following the going public decision. Floros and Shastri (2010) compare and contrast the decision to go public using RMs versus penny stock IPOs (PSIPOs). They hypothesize that RM companies are highly information asymmetric, since they do not conduct a public offering at the consummation of the deal.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, with the exception of Floros and Shastri (2010), prior academic work on RMs has been focused on transactions between two regularly operating companies creating synergies after the consummation of the RM deal. Most existing work does not focus on shell company RMs, and no existing study focuses on shell company performance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sjostrom (2008) [12], [13], [6]. We compare these Chinese RM companies' characteristics and performances to three benchmarks.…”
Section: A Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%