2014
DOI: 10.4304/jltr.5.4.865-872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Perceived Use of the Metacognitive Reading Strategies by Iranian Master of Science Students for Hypertext and Printed Academic Materials

Abstract: Abstract-This study aims at finding out whether there are any significant differences between perceived use of the metacognitive reading strategies by Iranian Master of Science (MSc) students for hypertext and printed academic materials. To this end, fifty four students in total were randomly selected from MSc students of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences in Iran. Having received the research instruments, the subjects completed the demographic information sheet and two other questionnaires, i.e., the surv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
0
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
0
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to metacognitive reading strategies (MRSs), it is manifest that the overwhelming majority of the EFL subjects under focal study did not seem to be sufficiently aware of this sort of strategies. This is in accord with previous related research (Tavacoli, 2014;Ostovar-Namaghi & Noghabi, 2014) claiming that the perceived use of MRSs is lacking among learners. Obviously, the awareness and use of the cognitive reading strategies (CRSs) were significantly predominant during the act of text processing among the sampled subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…With respect to metacognitive reading strategies (MRSs), it is manifest that the overwhelming majority of the EFL subjects under focal study did not seem to be sufficiently aware of this sort of strategies. This is in accord with previous related research (Tavacoli, 2014;Ostovar-Namaghi & Noghabi, 2014) claiming that the perceived use of MRSs is lacking among learners. Obviously, the awareness and use of the cognitive reading strategies (CRSs) were significantly predominant during the act of text processing among the sampled subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Desde la perspectiva de una nueva cultura textual necesaria para los lectores que tienen que hacer frente a los diferentes problemas y dificultades que surgen del entorno de la lectura hipertextual (Vörös et al, 2011;Walhout et al, 2015;Evans y Po, 2007;Ostovar-Namaghi y Noghabi, 2014), será necesario incorporar nuevas habilidades y competencias que es posible asociar a cinco campos: (a) la identificación de problemas y preguntas, (b) la localización de información de múltiples recursos en línea, (c) la evaluación crítica de la información en línea, (d) la síntesis de la información en línea, (e) la comunicación y el intercambio de información en línea (Salmerón et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discusión Y Proyección Para Futuras Investigacionesunclassified
“…La investigación ha llevado a destacar el papel de las estrategias (Ostovar-Namaghi y Noghabi, 2014;Salmerón et al, 2005;Zammit, 2011) en la práctica de tareas de lectura en la red. Las estrategias de lectura se caracterizan por su sistematicidad y buscan (ya sea la lectura en pantalla o en papel) decodificar un mensaje y construir significados.…”
Section: Discusión Y Proyección Para Futuras Investigacionesunclassified