2016
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2016/611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Postoperative Hearing Gain in Dry and Wet Ear Tympanoplasty

Abstract: OBJECTIVETo compare hearing gain in dry and wet tympanoplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODSA total of 100 ears were included in the study. Two groups were created with 50 ears in each group. All patients had mucosal chronic otitis media. One group had dry ear, another had wet ear at the time of surgery. Type 1 tympanoplasty was done in all the cases by a single surgeon. Hearing gain was calculated 3 months after surgery for both groups and compared. RESULTSHearing improvement seen in 35 (70%) cases in dry ear group a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collectively, the finding from this systematic review and meta-analysis is consistent with recent individual studies conducted in past 8 years (8,9,37,41,52,53), which finds that there are no statistically significant differences between the postoperative hearing outcomes of wet and dry ears. One theoretical reasoning explaining this is that a tympanic membrane perforation affects the conductive pathway of hearing regardless of whether the ear is wet or dry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Collectively, the finding from this systematic review and meta-analysis is consistent with recent individual studies conducted in past 8 years (8,9,37,41,52,53), which finds that there are no statistically significant differences between the postoperative hearing outcomes of wet and dry ears. One theoretical reasoning explaining this is that a tympanic membrane perforation affects the conductive pathway of hearing regardless of whether the ear is wet or dry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%