2009
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of pre‐ and post‐remediation water quality, Mineral Creek, Colorado

Abstract: Abstract:Pre-and post-remediation data sets are used herein to assess the effectiveness of remedial measures implemented in the headwaters of the Mineral Creek watershed, where contamination from hard rock mining has led to elevated metal concentrations and acidic pH. Collection of pre-and post-remediation data sets generally followed the synoptic mass balance approach, in which numerous stream and inflow locations are sampled for the constituents of interest and estimates of streamflow are determined by trace… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfavorable localization of the Wiśniówka mining area, i.e., a dismembered mountain range reaching 100 m in relative elevation and the proximity of villages, makes it difficult to utilize abiotic or biotic remediation strategies (e.g., Banks et al 1997; Plumlee and Logsdon 1999; Coulton et al 2003; Johnson and Hallberg 2005; Runkel et al 2009). In addition, the lack of flat areas for construction of large biotic aerobic ponds or wetlands and (an) aerobic plots has forced the mining company to use other options of AMD water remediation, including anoxic limestone drains, impermeable barriers to potential acid seeps, lime addition, and revegetation of some tailings piles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfavorable localization of the Wiśniówka mining area, i.e., a dismembered mountain range reaching 100 m in relative elevation and the proximity of villages, makes it difficult to utilize abiotic or biotic remediation strategies (e.g., Banks et al 1997; Plumlee and Logsdon 1999; Coulton et al 2003; Johnson and Hallberg 2005; Runkel et al 2009). In addition, the lack of flat areas for construction of large biotic aerobic ponds or wetlands and (an) aerobic plots has forced the mining company to use other options of AMD water remediation, including anoxic limestone drains, impermeable barriers to potential acid seeps, lime addition, and revegetation of some tailings piles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the southwestern USA, including the San Juan Mountains, can be characterized by bimodal precipitation patterns, i.e., spring snowmelt and summer monsoon rains [24]. Previous mine drainage studies in the region have demonstrated that consistent low-flow conditions are most attainable in late summer (August-October) after monsoon rains have subsided and prior to freezing conditions during the winter months [15,25,26]. To quantitatively and qualitatively assess individual components of the hydrologic system, a series of independent environmental and applied tracers were applied and/or sampled at discrete locations within the study area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elevated aquatic Cu +2 concentrations are primarily occurring near copper mining, smelting facilities and in urbanized areas [21,25]. Higher Cu +2 concentrations are observed in mine-impacted Mineral Creek Colorado, where they were approximately 410 ppb [55] and around the mine impacted Copperas Brook in Vermont where they were around 4600 ppb [8]. Sansalone et al [56] documented Cu +2 concentrations of 325 ppb in urban storm water run-off, such copper concentrations are lethal to fish and aquatic life [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%