2015
DOI: 10.22599/bioj.90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of pre-school versus school-age orthoptic screening programmes in the North-East of England

Abstract: Aim: Following changes to the age at which our primary vision screening programmes are delivered we aimed to assess the impact of this change of practice on final vision outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective notes review of visual outcomes of children failing from two primary vision screening programmes: group A who were screened at pre-school age (3.5 years old) and group B who were screened at school entry age (4-5 years old).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study by Dent and Fieldsend (2015) suggested coverage is much better when screening is carried out in school compared to pre-school. They found the coverage at pre-school to be as low as 60% in contrast to 96% at school.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A previous study by Dent and Fieldsend (2015) suggested coverage is much better when screening is carried out in school compared to pre-school. They found the coverage at pre-school to be as low as 60% in contrast to 96% at school.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Based on our findings and those from school screening programs, it is clear that access to children for screening without the need for specific expenditure of parental time and effort is the most successful approach to recruiting a large proportion of children. It appears that screening in community health centers and centralized locations poses barriers associated with parents attending with their child, and invitation-based recruitment processes frequently achieve comparatively low rates of response 14,15. Adding to the success of the StEPS program in accessing children in NSW is the Australian government’s commitment to providing universal access to preschool education in the year prior to starting school.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The program also had a high screening rate that increased over the time period studied, particularly in rural and regional locations, while remaining steady in metropolitan Sydney. In previous reports of childhood vision screening programs, the main determinant of access by children to vision screening has appeared to be where screening is conducted, with considerably higher uptake rates ( > 90%) from school screening 14,15 than preschool settings (49%-75%). [14][15][16][17] As reports of school vision screening programs are generally from countries with comprehensive education, recruitment to vision screening for school-aged children is likely to be more universal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations