A comparison of procedures involving Single Step Salmonella, 1-2 Test, and Modified Semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for detection of Salmonella in ground beef

Afflu, L; Gyles, Carlton

doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(97)00076-7

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results of this study agree with another that likewise confirms the good productivity of MSRV agar in chicken carcasses and raw meat samples (1,28,36,39).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat

Franchin¹,

Ogliari²,

Andrade³

et al. 2006

Braz. J. Microbiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A study was performed to compare the analytical procedure of the BAX ® System for Salmonella PCR assay with the Modified Semi-Solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) method, for the detection of Salmonella in naturally contaminated chicken carcass samples (n = 762) and raw pork meat (n = 566). The chicken carcasses samples were collected during slaughtering after defeathering or immediately after evisceration and the raw pork meat collected from the deboned head of recently slaughtered pigs and others deboned raw fresh pork meat. The BAX ® System detected 134 Salmonella-positive samples in chicken carcasses and 145 samples in pork meat, while the MSRV method isolated 142 and 144 Salmonella-positive samples, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the two methods for chicken carcasses and pork meat, according to McNemar test at the 5% level.

show abstract

“…The results of this study agree with another that likewise confirms the good productivity of MSRV agar in chicken carcasses and raw meat samples (1,28,36,39).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat

Franchin¹,

Ogliari²,

Andrade³

et al. 2006

Braz. J. Microbiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…MSRV medium was compared with the Single-Step Salmonella (SSS) method and the 1-2 Test for the detection of Salmonella in ground beef contaminated with five Salmonella serotypes inoculated at 10, 10 2 , and 10 3 cfu g À1 in triplicate (Afflu and Gyles, 1997). MSRV medium was compared with the Single-Step Salmonella (SSS) method and the 1-2 Test for the detection of Salmonella in ground beef contaminated with five Salmonella serotypes inoculated at 10, 10 2 , and 10 3 cfu g À1 in triplicate (Afflu and Gyles, 1997).…”

Section: Modified Semisolid Rappaport-vassiliadis Mediummentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The 1-2 Test was compared with the SSS method and MSRV for the detection of Salmonella in ground beef contaminated with five Salmonella serotypes inoculated at 10, 10 2 , and 10 3 cfu g À1 in triplicate (Afflu and Gyles, 1997). When used after a combination of preenrichment (in buffered peptone water) followed by selective enrichment (in tetrathionate broth), the 1-2 Test detected only two of five strains at 100 cfu g À1 and none at 10 cfu g À1 (21/45 positive results) and was less sensitive than the SSS method and MSRV medium, which detected Salmonella in all 45 samples.…”

Section: Salmonella 1-2 Testmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enrichment Serology

Blackburn

2014

Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Two studies described methods dependent on organism motility 127,128 and no studies described bioassays. Studies described antigen detection methods in different formats [n = 20, RPLA, ELISA, IMS, automated IMS (AIMS), PCR-ELISA, FIA and lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA)] and nucleic acid-based methods (n = 20, PCR and rtPCR with or without BAX, VIDAS and Taqman systems) and the remainder described rapid or standard traditional-style methods (n = 5).…”

Section: Salmonella Species Food Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of the clinical, public health and cost-effectiveness of rapid diagnostic tests for the detection and identification of bacterial intestinal pathogens in faeces and food

Abubakar¹,

Irvine²,

Aldus³

et al. 2007

Health Technol Assess

103

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per monograph and for the rest of the world £3 per monograph.You can order HTA monographs from our Despatch Agents:-fax (with credit card or official purchase order) -post (with credit card or official purchase order or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you either to pay securely by credit card or to print out your order and then post or fax it. NHS libraries can subscribe free of charge. Public libraries can subscribe at a very reduced cost of £100 for each volume (normally comprising 30-40 titles). The commercial subscription rate is £300 per volume. Please see our website for details. Subscriptions can only be purchased for the current or forthcoming volume. Contact details are as follows: Payment methods Paying by chequeIf you pay by cheque, the cheque must be in pounds sterling, made payable to Direct Mail Works Ltd and drawn on a bank with a UK address. Paying by credit cardThe following cards are accepted by phone, fax, post or via the website ordering pages: Delta, Eurocard, Mastercard, Solo, Switch and Visa. We advise against sending credit card details in a plain email. Paying by official purchase orderYou can post or fax these, but they must be from public bodies (i.e. NHS or universities) within the UK. We cannot at present accept purchase orders from commercial companies or from outside the UK. How do I get a copy of HTA on CD?Please use the form on the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk/htacd.htm). Or contact Direct Mail Works (see contact details above) by email, post, fax or phone. HTA on CD is currently free of charge worldwide.The website also provides information about the HTA Programme and lists the membership of the various committees. HTA NIHR Health Technology Assessment ProgrammeT he Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme, now part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 1993. It produces high-quality research information on the costs, effectiveness and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined to include all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care, rather than settings of care. The research findings from the HTA Programme directly influence decision-making bodies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the National Screening Committee (NSC). HTA findings also help to improve the quality of clinical practice in the NHS indirectly in that they form a key component of the 'National Knowledge Service'. The HTA Programme is needs-led in that it fills gaps in the evidence needed by the NHS. There are three routes to the start of projects. First is the commissioned route. Suggestions for research are actively sought from people working in the NHS, the public and consumer groups and professional bodies such as r...

show abstract

A comparison of procedures involving Single Step Salmonella, 1-2 Test, and Modified Semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for detection of Salmonella in ground beef

Cited by 5 publications

References 6 publications

Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat

Comparision of the BAX® System with an in-house MSRV method for the detection of Salmonella in chicken carcasses and pork meat

Enrichment Serology

A systematic review of the clinical, public health and cost-effectiveness of rapid diagnostic tests for the detection and identification of bacterial intestinal pathogens in faeces and food

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About