1955
DOI: 10.1037/h0047938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of pursuit and compensatory tracking under conditions of aiding and no aiding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For studying pursuit tracking, many experiments have been performed where task performance and control behavior were compared to that observed for compensatory tracking [4]- [8]. Even though not all reported findings are consistent, in general tracking with a pursuit display is found to result in better task performance than attained for compensatory tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For studying pursuit tracking, many experiments have been performed where task performance and control behavior were compared to that observed for compensatory tracking [4]- [8]. Even though not all reported findings are consistent, in general tracking with a pursuit display is found to result in better task performance than attained for compensatory tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Aiding has been found to facilitate operator performance significantly on negligible inertia systems such a electronic forcing functions [ 131. Further increases in performance levels have been observed with controls having higher-order dynamics, such as acceleration and rate of change of acceleration [14,15]. Aiding has a relatively less positive effect on high-inertia systems that have inherent and significant response lags [16].…”
Section: Control Aidingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of a study by Chernikoff, Birmingham, and Taylor (1955) also indicate that the optimum display configuration might be different in different I situations. Pursuit tracking might be preferred for high frequency control; however, compensatory tracking might be sufficient for low frequency control.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%