1972
DOI: 10.1016/0041-008x(72)90157-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of rabbit and human skin response to certain irritants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings were reported by Phillips et al (1972). Macko and Weeks (1980) also indicated that m-Det was not a photochemical irritant.…”
Section: Skin Irritation/sensitization Studiessupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar findings were reported by Phillips et al (1972). Macko and Weeks (1980) also indicated that m-Det was not a photochemical irritant.…”
Section: Skin Irritation/sensitization Studiessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Cumulative irritation scores were 9, 18.5, 61, 50.5, 48 and 21 of a possible 84 points for conce1trations ot 1, 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80% m-Det, respectively (Phillips et al, 1972).…”
Section: Human Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cutaneous response is quantified as erythema produced by the various mixtures in a 21-day cumulative irritation patch test [2], The role of solution behavior of these sur factants is explored as a key factor regulating this in vivo cutaneous response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skin of the rabbit is especially sensitive to various kinds of cosmetic compounds, compared with that of guinea pig, rat, miniature pig, and human 3,4 . The sensitivity of the skin is known to be affected by the hair cycle 5,6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%