Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1997
DOI: 10.1145/258549.258787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents

Abstract: We report on a laboratory study that compares reading from paper to reading on-line. Critical differences have to do with the major advantages paper offers in supporting annotation while reading, quick navigation, and flexibility of spatial layout. These, in turn, allow readers to deepen their understanding of the text, extract a sense of its structure, create a plan for writing, cross-refer to other documents, and interleave reading and writing. We discuss the design implications of these findings for the dev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

18
294
1
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 387 publications
(319 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
18
294
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Creating annotations and notes improves retention and comprehension (Marshall & Ruotolo, 2002;O'Hara & Sellen, 1997) and, more importantly for knowledge workers, enables readers to make -relevant connections to their own writing‖ (Hillesund, 2010). While underlining, marginal marks, and brief notes do not have -explicit meaning to the computer, they have rich semantic meaning for people and enhance visual and episodic memory‖ and the -ability to make unstructured, free-form, idiosyncratic‖ marks on digital text is a fundamental affordance needed to support knowledge workers of all sorts (Schilit, et al 1999, p. 67).…”
Section: Ebook Devices and Knowledge Workersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creating annotations and notes improves retention and comprehension (Marshall & Ruotolo, 2002;O'Hara & Sellen, 1997) and, more importantly for knowledge workers, enables readers to make -relevant connections to their own writing‖ (Hillesund, 2010). While underlining, marginal marks, and brief notes do not have -explicit meaning to the computer, they have rich semantic meaning for people and enhance visual and episodic memory‖ and the -ability to make unstructured, free-form, idiosyncratic‖ marks on digital text is a fundamental affordance needed to support knowledge workers of all sorts (Schilit, et al 1999, p. 67).…”
Section: Ebook Devices and Knowledge Workersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, while reading one page, readers can use another page for writing notes. -orientation: paper documents give readers a better sense of location within the text, by physical cues, such as the thickness on the sides of a book or different paper materials in a magazine [10]. These cues support text skimming and cross-reading and they are instrumental when trying to relocate some text [13,14].…”
Section: Annotations In Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cues support text skimming and cross-reading and they are instrumental when trying to relocate some text [13,14]. Digital documents do not hold these characteristics [8,10], an issue that needs to be overcome by increased attention for usability in device design and interface design. -multiple displays: paper provides a single canvas for each page of text [15].…”
Section: Annotations In Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is surprising, given the abundance of literature showing the importance of annotations for comprehension and their benefits for reading and writing proposes [5]. Similar to the paper-based environment, digital annotations are expected to be useful for supporting comprehension and interpretation [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%