2003
DOI: 10.4102/jsava.v74i2.501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of selected public health criteria in milk from milk-shops and from a national distributor

Abstract: Selected public health criteria of pasteurised milk available to the consumer from milk-shops in a pre-defined area of Pretoria compared with a national distributor's milk was evaluated. Of the 135 milk samples purchased from milk-shops, 87 % were not fit for human consumption on the basis of the minimum standards prescribed in the Foodstuffs, Cosmetics and Disinfectants Act, 1972 (Act 54 of1972). The national distributor's milk (n = 79) did not contain any pathogens, toxins nor inhibitory substances and passe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prevalence of raw milk samples above SA national standards (SA, 2001 Act (54), (1972)) were 42 %, 88 % and 68 % for E. coli, coliforms and total aerobic plate counts, respectively. Our results on microbial counts from raw PDBM, where more than 60 % of the sample were above national standard, were consistent with previous studies carried out in SA (Lues et al, 2003, O'Ferrall-Berndt, 2003, Lues et al, 2010 (2004) USA. These studies highlighted, animal and equipment cleanliness, feeding and housing strategies, rinsing water for milking machine and milking equipment washing, mastitis in animals, milk transportation and storage conditions, as reasons for high microbial counts in raw milk.…”
Section: Total Plate Count Coliforms and E Coli Counts In Retail Pdbmsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Prevalence of raw milk samples above SA national standards (SA, 2001 Act (54), (1972)) were 42 %, 88 % and 68 % for E. coli, coliforms and total aerobic plate counts, respectively. Our results on microbial counts from raw PDBM, where more than 60 % of the sample were above national standard, were consistent with previous studies carried out in SA (Lues et al, 2003, O'Ferrall-Berndt, 2003, Lues et al, 2010 (2004) USA. These studies highlighted, animal and equipment cleanliness, feeding and housing strategies, rinsing water for milking machine and milking equipment washing, mastitis in animals, milk transportation and storage conditions, as reasons for high microbial counts in raw milk.…”
Section: Total Plate Count Coliforms and E Coli Counts In Retail Pdbmsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The primary objective of this study has been to isolate and identify S. aureus from milk obtained from supermarkets, shops and farms around the North-West Province, South Africa. The main motivation is that food-borne pathogens, including S. aureus , have been isolated from milk and dairy products worldwide [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. Moreover, a baseline study previously conducted in the area revealed the presence of S. aureus in milk collected from a communal farm and two commercial farms [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor hygienic practices during production and /or processing may give rise to this situation. In Nigeria, S. aureus was reported in the range of 25 to 45% in locally produced fermented milk, Nono (Nnadi, 2006) while in Pretoria, South Africa, 40% of the milk samples collected from milk shops were found to be contaminated with S. aureus (O`Ferrall-Berndt, 2003). Milk collected from large and small-scale dairy farms in Kenya for a multidrug resistance study reported a 30.6% prevalence of S. aureus (Shitandi and Sternesj, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%