2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of shale permeability coefficients derived using multiple non-steady-state measurement techniques: Examples from the Duvernay Formation, Alberta (Canada)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But, in Aljamaan et al 's [35] experiment, the measurements are conducted on dried samples. Ghanizadeh et al [48] indicated that permeability values measured on dried samples are higher than those measured on "as-received" samples, which is due to the presence of pore fluid (bound/adsorbed water and hydrocarbon) in "as-received" samples [48]. The bound/adsorbed water and hydrocarbon partially block pore channels, which results in the decrease of permeability [49].…”
Section: Model Validation With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, in Aljamaan et al 's [35] experiment, the measurements are conducted on dried samples. Ghanizadeh et al [48] indicated that permeability values measured on dried samples are higher than those measured on "as-received" samples, which is due to the presence of pore fluid (bound/adsorbed water and hydrocarbon) in "as-received" samples [48]. The bound/adsorbed water and hydrocarbon partially block pore channels, which results in the decrease of permeability [49].…”
Section: Model Validation With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high rate of permeability loss (high ) can be attributed to the narrowing or removal of the more compressible pores from the fluid conducting network. Although has not been found to differ greatly between the Whitby Mudstone samples, it can be expected to vary with mineralogy of different rock types (particularly clay content (Chalmers et al 2012;Ghanizadeh et al 2014a;Ghanizadeh et al 2014b;Ghanizadeh et al 2015) and microstructure.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Permeability To Confining Pressurementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The pulse-decay permeability measurement method has been widely recognized as a way to identify the ultra-low permeability rocks [28,30,[48][49][50][51][52][53]. Because the conventional permeability measurement is based on recording the flow rate during the experiment, the flow rate through the ultra-low permeability rock is too small to be measured exactly under the precision of present equipment.…”
Section: Permeability Stress Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%