2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2022.107433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of single and multiple changepoint techniques for time series data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the test is invalid and will produce spurious false positives. This is well known in the univariate changepoint literature (Shi et al, 2021) and can be mitigated by scaling the threshold by the autocorrelation observed.…”
Section: Finite Sample Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the test is invalid and will produce spurious false positives. This is well known in the univariate changepoint literature (Shi et al, 2021) and can be mitigated by scaling the threshold by the autocorrelation observed.…”
Section: Finite Sample Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…discussed in [11]. The term |m − k| accounts for the discrepancy between the changepoint counts in the two configurations and the "minimum component" min A(C 1 , C 2 ) measures how well the two changepoint time sets align with one and other.…”
Section: Distances Between Changepoint Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While WBS2-SDLL works better than WBS, performance issues remain. We refer to [11] for additional comparisons of multiple changepoint techniques. Our overarching point is that a more extensive comparison of these techniques is needed in low-and mid-frequency changepoint settings.…”
Section: Wbs Performance In Infrequent Changepoint Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Killick et al, 2012;Maidstone et al, 2017); and for different types of data, such as high-dimensional data (Wang and Samworth, 2018), network data (Wang et al, 2021), and general non-Euclidean data (Song and Chen, 2022;Dubey and Müller, 2020). See Truong et al (2020), Fearnhead and Rigaill (2020) and Shi et al (2022b) for an overview of this area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%